https://projects.duckcorp.org/https://projects.duckcorp.org/favicon.ico?16699090422017-08-29T12:16:14ZDuckCorp ProjectsDuckCorp Infrastructure - Review #588: commit 3eabeec1f38110b8fb669b5d42dc01afee78ecd8https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/588?journal_id=14632017-08-29T12:16:14ZPierre-Louis Bonicolipierre-louis.bonicoli@ir5.eu
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/1463/diff?detail_id=1711">diff</a>)</li></ul> DuckCorp Infrastructure - Review #588: commit 3eabeec1f38110b8fb669b5d42dc01afee78ecd8https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/588?journal_id=14652017-08-29T12:58:07ZPierre-Louis Bonicolipierre-louis.bonicoli@ir5.eu
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> set to <i>Service :: Backup</i></li></ul> DuckCorp Infrastructure - Review #588: commit 3eabeec1f38110b8fb669b5d42dc01afee78ecd8https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/588?journal_id=14782017-08-29T14:22:20ZMarc Dequènesduck@duckcorp.org
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul><p>So yes the template is able to cope with it, but when I ran the playbook it failed in <code>client_specific_conf.yml</code>. Fact is the submodule was lagging behind, as stated in <a class="issue tracker-8 status-7 priority-4 priority-default" title="Review: Review branch backup (In Progress)" href="https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/518">#518</a>, so this <code>vars</code> block did not exist.</p>
<p>So it's not unneeded, it's already fixed.</p> DuckCorp Infrastructure - Review #588: commit 3eabeec1f38110b8fb669b5d42dc01afee78ecd8https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/588?journal_id=14852017-08-29T22:41:19ZPierre-Louis Bonicolipierre-louis.bonicoli@ir5.eu
<ul></ul><p>f7ed8c5600d8eed28b614eb6204ea3b887a5dd59 hasn't been cherry picked.</p>